Archived entries for eLearning

No alarms and no surprises? Inspection Report ICT Comments

Comments from the report are detailed under the headings from the report.

Inspection

CC licence from flickr user pasukaru76

The school did very well overall. There was no ICT specialist on the inspection team. The document is now public. The question is, what does this mean for ICT in the school. No alarms and no surprises? However, opportunities are presenting themselves to consolidate existing good practice and expand the use of technology throughout the curriculum.

Pupil’s Learning and Achievements

‘Although proficient and sometimes highly skilled in the use of ICT, they under-employ this skill in their lessons.’

‘Some are skilled users of ICT. In a graphic design lesson, pupils in Y8 manipulated and altered images using a range of software tools to create a soft drinks carton, and in an English lesson pupils in Y11 produced high callibre posters using composite images and symbols from the internet.’

‘Despite the good ICT skills that most have acquired, pupils do not fully exploit these skills to assist their learning, nor do they make much use of the school library as a learning resource, relying instead on their teachers and text books as their sources of information.’

The Quality of teaching (including assessment)

Often pupils who use ICT well for independent study do so of their own volition rather than directly as a result of teacher suggestion, although good use is made of specialist software in music and design.’

RE teachers: ‘Many are also skilled users of technology to enhance their teaching.’

‘Although teaching frequently makes use of the interactive whiteboard, its full potential is not universally realised across departments.’

Conclusion and next steps

‘Develop the library as a significant educational resource that encourages pupils to make greater use of both books and the extensive ICT resources that are available to facilitate their independent learning.’

Your thoughts, as always, are welcome.

Inspection Report comments on ICT

Pupil’s Learning and Achievements

‘Although proficient and sometimes highly skilled in the use of ICT, they under-employ this skill in their lessons.’

‘Some are skilled users of ICT. In a graphic design lesson, pupils in Y8 manipulated and altered images using a range of software tools to create a soft drinks carton, and in an English lesson pupils in Y11 produced high callibre posters using composite images and symbols from the internet.’

‘Despite the good ICT skills that most have acquired, pupils do not fully exploit these skills to assist their learning, nor do they make much use of the school library as a learning resource, relying instead on their teachers and text books as their sources of information.’

The Quality of teaching (including assessment)

Often pupils who use ICT well for independent study do so of their own volition rather than directly as a result of teacher suggestion, although good use is made of specialist software in music and design.’

RE teachers: ‘Many are also skilled users of technology to enhance their teaching.’

‘Although teaching frequently makes use of the interactive whiteboard, its full potential is not universally realised across departments.’

Conclusion and next steps

‘Develop the library as a significant educational resource that encourages pupils to make greater use of both books and the extensive ICT resources that are available to facilitate their independent learning.’

46/365 The digital teacher is here?

Moodle course for school fencing team run by Mr Gale (@mggale on Twitter or @stbensfencing). He’s using Twitter, moodle, voki, and is now asking me about creating a facebook page to connect to the Twitter feed for his fencers to follow. Cool.

Posted via email from daibarnes’s posterous

45/365 Rainy day

We use these stones to keep playing cards in place during many family card games in better weather.

Posted via email from daibarnes’s posterous

VLEs. What/who are they for again?

Sallinger

CC from jetalone on flickr

There are new systems out there (e.g. http://openhive.net, 35 developers for three years released at BETT2010) that are very impressive – based on farming things in and out of the MIS to connect people seamlessly to their learning communities (teachers to classes etc) and create a set of learning tools and shibboleth SSO to get you wherever you want to go. I took a shoddy video at BETT – http://www.youtube.com/user/daibarnes#p/a/u/2/BCDi5KWFU0g and http://www.youtube.com/user/daibarnes#p/u/3/oumghI5B0_U. There’s another one for Frog which I’ll put on my channel today.

How much they drill down into and improve the mechanics of learning is hard to say because this is still (and will probably remain) an undetermined facet of elearning. Those of us that engage our learners (and are learners) with the internet may sing songs from rooftops but there are many teachers who are doing an excellent job and poopooing the tech becomes part of their success. [You're the ICT teacher - that's your job] The only place where they may fall short is a lack of preparing the young for their future. Is this sufficient to enforce significant change to their practice?

I think what I am trying to say is that good quality learning (however that might be defined) is not exclusive to technology. Therefore, Moodle and similar products are not the answer. They are a means of connecting people around the maypole of content and activities. The access to that content is still the job of the teacher – lead the dance, or at least get it started. Caution about opting for a proprietry system should be tempered by considering the value it adds to an institution/community and to the learning that occurs therein. And, therefore, I arrive back at Moodle which can be employed with external expertise for less per annum than the income of one child in the state sector.

My final point is to say that if we, as tech-invested educators, keep assessing a system by its capacity to penetrate the teaching community then we are misguided. The use itself will flow, burst the banks and spread in due course. Or maybe not. I am confident that children who pass through my classroom at A Level receive a rich technologically enhanced learning experience. I am not so confident this is the same in Y7 and Y8 where I see them for 40 minutes each week (something I must get a hold on). I am equally not confident that every pupil who passes through my school is prepped for life beyond the school. Maybe the school, via me, should plan which handful of subjects are going to embrace online learning to spread this essential educational substance and focus on that rather than the unattainable nirvana of every subject, every teacher, every pupil?

I would welcome tech being used more and more to facilitate the learner (handhelds, email, calendars, searching, etc.). Teachers and learners in the classroom, project-by-project and in negotiation with each other, will determine when and how it is used. As an ed tech leader I am 100% convinced, and able to argue, that tech helps people organise and provide access to material. As a teacher I am passionate about quality learning. Combining these two is, for me (but not for all), the rub. If another teacher tells me their rub is only the latter – they have my full support. Aye, the collaboration. Aye, the peer assessment opportunities. Aye, the digital citizen. But still.

Raise high the roof beam, carpenters. Like Ares comes the bridegroom, taller far than a tall man. J.D.Sallinger

or maybe…

Life is many days. This will end. J Joyce

44/365 Valentines

My present. Beautiful and meaningful. A lucky man I am (and not because I have a new lighter). Family life has brought many obstacles which we have so far managed to overcome. Thank you. Many times I could not have survived without the bearer of this gift.

Posted via email from daibarnes’s posterous



I see tea is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. CC

RSS Feed. This blog uses Wordpress and Modern Clix

Switch to our mobile site