Archived entries for

MA Notes: Halliday, J. (2002) ‘Researching Values in Education’

MA Article Notes

Halliday, J. (2002) ‘Researching Values in Education’ British Educational Research Journal. Vol. 28, No. 1, 2002

I found this article hard going. Read it over a period of time (holidays) and had to work hard to follow its arguments. Ultimately I have written this with close reference to the conclusion where Halliday generously summarises his method. I have also included definitions from wikipedia for terms I am unfamiliar with and the links to their source pages. My text/thoughts are in bold to distinguish them from Halliday’s, because I found it difficult to re-write what he is saying.

My conclusions:

For us doing the masters, I think the reason we are reading this is to introduce us to the importance of the impact of our methodology on our research projects. I don’t find that Halliday gives us any answers here. He drags the whole debate into question by saying that we (researchers and educational institutions in general) do not have the means at our disposal to test the conclusions of others research, and, there is a tendency for research to compete to assert correct practice. In this, I think, he is saying that we must explore whatever research has been done into our chosen research area and, if at all possible, to build on that rather than branch off and do our research for it’s own self-serving sake in a maverick-style context. Instead of seeing other research as competition, we are to acknowledge and embrace in the interests of furthering the value position in a particular field. Therefore, our research will become part of the wider fabric of research into that area.

Continue reading…

9/365 Masters: reading, making notes in GDoc on netbook

Preparing for masters. Tuition on Wednesday. Article is Halliday (2002), Researching Values in Education.

Arguing values in research are inevitable and that we should find a better language to discuss the possible limitations intrinsic in research.

‘There may be more appropriate vocabularies that at present with which to accept the contextuality and limitations of educational research without giving up on the idea that such research can be systematic and cumulative. It might then be possible to communicate more directly the hard core of educational research programmes.’ Halliday (2002:61)

Not finding article very accessible but doing my best to crack a few new neurons. Or is it simply boring me stupid?

Posted via email from daibarnes’s posterous



I see tea is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. CC

RSS Feed. This blog uses Wordpress and Modern Clix

Switch to our mobile site